Screw Up: Forever 21 – A Fashion Disaster

Founded in 1984 by South Korean immigrants Do Won Chang and Jin Sook Chang, Forever 21 catered to Korean Americans in Los Angeles but rapidly expanded to several countries. Changing their brand name from Fashion 21 to the now Forever 21, they transformed the fashion industry with their fast-fashion business model. While they originally sold fashion inspired by South Korean fashion trends, their rapid change required something fresh, where their fast fashion began to thrive. However, was this exact change their downfall? 

Nowadays, Forever 21 is synonymous with “being cheap,” and the company has faced immense criticism for its poor labour practices. Moreover, their lack of sustainability has garnered criticism, especially among younger shoppers who are more conscious about which brands practise sustainable fashion. Forever 21 also failed to anticipate the “retail apocalypse,” underestimating the rise of e-commerce and facing an avoidable financial crisis. 

Where Did It All Go Wrong? 

Investing in Big Stores in Big Spaces 

In a mere 6 years, Forever 21 expanded from 7 countries to 47. However, while most retail stores focused on downsizing, Forever 21 did not get the memo and kept their unnecessarily large stores. The larger the scale, the more the rent. Forever 21 couldn’t realistically afford all of these stores, especially knowing that the largest one is 162,000 square feet in size and multiple stories tall. Their sales went down by 25%, which indicates that their large stores in expensive areas cost them a lot of money. Affording rent and operational costs for them subsequently led them to bankruptcy. They now have to close down more than 350 of their stores worldwide. 

Fast Fashion’s Lack of Sustainability

Forever 21 was the pinnacle of fast fashion, costing them more than they could ever predict. Fast fashion contributes to at least 20% of wastewater and 10% of global carbon emissions. How does it contribute, you ask? The synthetic material of these trendy clothes, as well as the quick manufacturing process, leads to consumers quickly throwing away the cheap products. Thus, fast fashion is almost guaranteed to be a wasteful item and harmful to the environment. Forever 21 failed to understand consumer sentiment towards the climate crisis and kept mass-producing fast fashion. A company must always evolve with consumer feedback and trends. 

Failing to Adapt to E-Commerce 

The rise of e-commerce is another customer preference that Forever 21 failed to capitalise on. By the time they caught up to the e-commerce game, other famous brands like ASOS and Myntra were already on the rise with their easy returns and fast delivery. Forever 21 couldn’t perfectly align itself with younger customers anymore, especially with those from other countries such as China or India.

Is It Trendsetting If It’s Cringe? 

It’s undeniable that Forever 21 thrived in the 2000s, especially with their target 21-year-old customer base. Everyone went to Forever 21 for the latest fashion trends and the affordable price. When it entered the Indian market, customers were flooding their expansive stores. However, with their fame came their downfall. As all trends do, they die. Forever 21 did not get that memo. Their fashion usually includes a normal-looking piece of clothing ruined by ridiculous quotes. It’s become a huge meme amongst shoppers who find something they like at Forever 21, only to turn it around and find it has a weird quote at the back. Customers eventually got tired of trying to find something that would be presentable and fashionable for the times. Forever 21, once again, did not listen to their customers. 

How Can a Business Learn From Forever 21’s Demise? 

Analyse Customer Trends 

As seen by most of the factors that led to their downfall, Forever 21 consistently ignored consumer trends and sentiments. Brands should always be conscious of what consumers want first and accept criticism as a step forward. It’s an important step in maintaining the trust of your customer base, a factor that will make your brand thrive. If you observe that the majority of your customers are dissatisfied with the design choices, better designs should be created. Similarly, a concern as grave as the climate crisis has to be addressed, and solutions for sustainable operations should be integrated immediately. Ethical practices have become a top priority among young shoppers nowadays. 

Keep Your Enemies Closer 

Keeping track of your competition is one of the most important aspects of running a successful business. Forever 21 lost the competition when they did not put any emphasis on online shopping, sticking to the brick-and-mortar stores that cost them gravely, did not meet consumer expectations, and overall, became outdated and bankrupt. However, if you actively monitor what your competitors are doing right and what mistakes they make, too, your brand can learn and do better. 

Reduce Operational Costs and Prevent Further Losses 

Despite consumers preferring online shopping and empty shopping malls, Forever 21 built more stores in premier locations and malls. A brand should always be aware of their spending habits and cut down costs wherever possible. Keeping an eye on the market direction will promote better profit and avoid any overhead costs. 

For fashion-related articles, read here

Screw Up: Byju’s Flurry of Mistakes

Byju’s had humble beginnings. Byju Raveendran, a hopeful and talented tutor to his peers, began Byju’s with his wife, Divya Gokulnath, in 2011. Before that, he was a service engineer who learnt of his teaching penchant by helping his friends crack the CAT exam in 2003. 2007 is when he decided to expand his services. The company started with a much smaller class size but saw significant growth. The focus was on online video-based learning programs catering to K-12 and preparations for competitive exams. 

In 2015, Byju’s launched an app, Byju’s: The Learning App, as smartphone screen sizes grew. They also launched a Parent Connect app and a kid-oriented app. But more importantly, they expanded to the United Kingdom, the United States of America, and other international markets. They estimated at least 150 million users, 900,000 paid users, and an average of 71 minutes of screen time in 2018. They became the first Ed-Tech unicorn in the same year, earning $1 billion in revenue. 

We have observed all this success in the past but they seem to be on the news all the time and not for good reasons. So where did Byju’s go wrong? 

Follow up with our Instagram series, Saturday Screw Ups: Byju’s

Byju Raveendran

COVID-19 and The Struggle to Catch Up 

Ed-Tech undeniably rose during the COVID-19 pandemic and Byju’s was a leading example for the Ed-Tech industry. They acquired several Ed-Tech startups, including those in the international market. Byju’s expanded but at what cost? Their expansive plans created major cash-flow problems and a $1.2 billion loan caused disputes with their creditors. More seriously, there were allegations of a toxic work culture. Employees were unable to leave until 10 pm, sick leaves were not a concept, and verbal abuse was a daily observation. There was immense pressure to acquire more customers by any means to regain revenue. 

In 2023, their valuation of $22 billion in 2022 was cut by 75%, causing layoffs as well as accusations of financial mismanagement. Their parent company, Think & Learn Pvt Ltd., was scrutinised for being unable to pay PF money to their employees. Moreover, Facebook and Google discontinued their ads after they failed to pay their ad dues. 

Aggressive Marketing and Sales Practices 

Relating to the COVID-19 pandemic, the disaster at Byju’s continued strong. Seeing their online presence getting strong, they went all out with marketing. However, their strategies were overwhelming. They were endorsed by Shah Rukh Khan and included several advertisements featuring the superstar. But in 2023, Shah Rukh Khan and Byju’s did not want to be associated with one another and mutually ended their contract. 

Byju’s had already moved on to Lionel Messi as their brand ambassador in 2022 with a 3-year contract. However, this move was met with severe criticism by the public. Employee layoffs were at a peak with 2,500 losing their jobs. Their deal with Messi backfired as their previously mentioned financial mismanagement caused them to have inadequate funds. They have now kept Messi’s ambassadorship on hold. We don’t see chances of it recovering. They ended up sponsoring several events, like the Indian Premier League and FIFA. 

After the lockdown and COVID-19 restrictions had been lifted, students began to prefer and resume offline classes. Being physically present has proven to be the more effective method of studying. Byju’s method of learning turned out to be less relevant with this sudden change. They had no game plan and resorted to an aggressive style of marketing. 

Messi’s sponsorship of Byju’s

Loan Fraud: They Went That Far

As mentioned earlier, employees were pressured to acquire customers through any means. An example of this is a report of an employee telling parents their children would fail if they didn’t subscribe to Byju’s program. This is incredibly manipulative but not unheard of for businesses. There were other strategies, like following up constantly with people they forced to download the app as well as opt for the 15-day free trial. Again, following up is a common strategy. However, if you fail to live up to those expectations, that’s another story. 

The quality of Byju’s classes also took a major fall with their financial struggle. Students and parents felt cheated and misled. Moreover, their courses cost as much as 1.35 Lakhs. Pushing these courses onto people, especially those of low income, is unjustifiable. It also turns out that lower-income customers were taken advantage of and taking loans to afford these courses. Considering it is incredibly tedious to get a loan in India, it was questionable how their customers would be able to get a loan. Byju’s had lending partnerships and essentially acted as guarantors for their customers. This strategy is known as the First Loss Default Guarantee (FLDG). In short, if the customer fails to pay, Byju’s is held responsible and pays for them. 

Massive Financial Mismanagement and Legal Issues

Byju’s acquired companies as if it were a hobby for them. They acquired Aakash Institute for $950 million, WhiteHat Jr for $300 million and 17 other companies. This made them face an increase in expenses, not making it worth the increase in users. Except for Aakash Institute, not all of them were profitable. Byju’s faced significant losses because of their overzealous acquisition. 

Byju’s also failed to repay a $300 million loan from Singaporean firm Redwood Global Investments but was undertaken after a deal of a $500 million loan was given in 2022. However, these financial mishaps caused Deloitte to pull back from Byju’s and subsequently Prosus, Sequoia, and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative also left Byju’s board. Byju’s fell into legal trouble due to these factors, facing a lawsuit filed by

Redwood Global Investments. Moreover, as of February 2024, Byju Raveendran has a lookout notice issued to him by India’s economic intelligence and law enforcement entity Enforcement Directorate. 

What are the key lessons learned from Byju’s and how can you apply them to your business? 

  • Proper accounting practice: To especially avoid financial irregularities and legal troubles, businesses should maintain a healthy cash flow and debt ratio, keep contingency plans in place, and avoid overwhelming their assets. Byju’s were overzealous in both marketing and taking out loans to meet dues. This is a terrible move that can sink your company. 
  • Maintain trust and respect: Byju’s lost respect in two important ways: Respect of their customers and their board members. Not only did parents and students feel completely cheated, but their board members were frustrated by their financial incompetence. Choosing quantity over quality can jeopardise the trust you keep with your partners. 
  • Healthy work culture: The employees make the company. Treating your employees like robots will get you nowhere and Byju’s proves that. Pressuring them, keeping them until 10 pm, no sick leaves, and verbal abuse are the only public knowledge we have of Byju’s deeds. Make sure your employees have a great work-life balance and maintain a patient attitude. 

Screw Up: The Decline of Yahoo

Yahoo was a leading company in the late 1990s and the early 2000s, possibly one of the best web services available. However, if you mention Yahoo now, you’d have to ironically Google it. Over a decade ago, it was holding its own against Google and Microsoft. With its peak valuation at $125 billion in 2000, it must have been hard to predict such a tech titan facing a downfall this unfortunate. 

What exactly happened to Yahoo? Yahoo now serves as a wake-up call to other companies to step up their innovation and create better strategies. Our article has broken down their story and mistakes. 

The founders of Yahoo! – David Filo and Jerry Yang

What is Yahoo? 

In January 1994, Jerry Yang and David Filo created Yahoo (often stylised as Yahoo!) as a small project. This small project was initially named, “Jerry and David’s Guide to the World Wide Web,” with the vision of a directory-style search engine. 

Fun fact: The full form of “Yahoo” is “Yet Another Hierarchically Organized Oracle” or “Yet Another Hierarchical Officious Oracle.”

Their services include– a web portal, Yahoo search engine, personalised page My Yahoo!, Yahoo Mail, Yahoo News, Yahoo Finance, Yahoo Sports, and Yahoo! Native. These were all active and regularly visited in the late 1990s and early 2000s.

 

These Grave Mistakes Cost Yahoo

Google: In 1998, Yahoo had the chance to buy Google for a mere $1 million and yet refused the offer. In 2002, Google’s offer raised to $5 billion which Yahoo countered for $3 billion, an amount the former rejected. This was one of the biggest mistakes Yahoo ever made as Google’s worth now sits at more than $1 trillion. 

Facebook: Yahoo tried to obtain Facebook for $1 billion in 2006. While their current valuation of $562.19 Billion is leagues above, Facebook was rapidly growing in 2006 and is a still remembered platform. Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Meta Platforms (originally Facebook), rejected the offer. However, reports have said that Facebook’s board of directors pushed for $1.1 billion which Yahoo then refused for reasons unknown. Settling for that price difference would have acquired them one of the most visited social media platforms. 

Microsoft: Now the turns were turned on Yahoo for the opportunity of a lifetime. Microsoft recognised Yahoo and offered to acquire them in 2008 at $46 billion. Despite their generosity, Yahoo rejected the offer, priding themselves to be worth more than the offer price. 

Yahoo’s valuation continued to decline over the years, with all of these strategic moves amounting to nothing when they could’ve proved to be beneficial. Ultimately in 2016, their several mistakes led to Yahoo being sold to Verizon at a mere $4.8 billion. 

Strategies That Proved Yahoo’s Lack of Vision and Care

Strange Deal with Microsoft: The two companies then made a deal where Yahoo! Search would be powered by Microsoft Bing’s search engine. However, Yahoo’s failure to innovate its search engine, not prioritising quality for a smooth user experience, is a whole other downfall. 

Failing to Power the Niche of Tumblr and Turning Down Netflix: After investing in Tumblr at $1.1 billion in 2013, it was made known that Yahoo could have purchased the streaming service, Netflix, at $4 billion. However, due to their lack of creativity, a quality Tumblr needed, Yahoo dragged Tumblr’s valuation down to $260 million in just 3 years. Now, Netflix sits at $261.74 Billion. 

Lack of Consistent Leadership: Yahoo began a vicious cycle of switching and hiring external executives. Filo and Yang relinquished leadership to others, which led to confusion in direction. As the saying goes, “Too many cooks spoil the broth” and Yahoo’s leadership style proves it. The constant change and variety left them with no clear-cut vision. A company needs a vision and Yahoo severely lacked one. With too many possible futures and ideas, their leadership ruined any chance of forming a plan. 

The Data Breaches of 2013 and 2014: Any web service provider should arrive with the promise of data protection. Consumers should have confidence that their privacy will not be compromised. However, Yahoo betrayed that trust. Despite Yahoo’s popularity in the 2000s, the 2010s were a different story altogether. In 2013, over 3 billion accounts were exposed, revealing their names, passwords, emails and phone numbers. This wasn’t the last as 2014 saw another 500 million accounts violated. This jeopardised their trust and connection to the general public. 

How They Could Have Used Alibaba: Yahoo decided to invest $1 billion in 2005 in the Chinese e-commerce website, Alibaba. Alibaba was a much younger company and Yahoo’s investment gave it a rush of growth. However, when their business became expansive, Yahoo failed to make the correct decision. Alibaba’s value in 2014 was $168 billion, an impressive number that should have encouraged Yahoo to make a move. However, Yahoo’s CEO during that period, Marissa Mayer, decided to instead sell a portion of their shares with Alibaba. 

Where is Yahoo Now? 

Initially sold to and merged with AOL (America Online) by Verizon Communications in 2017, Yahoo has now been acquired for 90% division by Apollo Global Management in September 2021. The former CEO of Tinder, Jimmy Lanzone, now serves as the CEO of Yahoo. 

Follow our series, Saturday Screw Ups on Instagram: Saturday Screw Up – Yahoo! 

What Can Companies Learn From Yahoo? 

Here are the best lessons we can learn from Yahoo’s mistake: 

  1. Embrace Innovation and Seize Opportunities: Yahoo’s decline serves as a stark reminder of the importance of innovation and seizing opportunities when they arise. Yahoo had the chance to acquire Google for a mere $1 million but passed it up. Fast forward to today, now Google is worth over $1 trillion. This highlights the importance of recognizing innovation and acting swiftly to capitalise on it. 
  2. Value Quality Over Quantity: Yahoo’s failed attempt to compete with Google in search engine technology demonstrated the importance of prioritizing quality over quantity. Despite partnering with Microsoft’s Bing search engine, Yahoo’s lack of innovation and failure to prioritize user experience led to its downfall. Companies should focus on providing high-quality services that meet customer needs rather than simply expanding.
  3. Maintain Consistent Leadership and Vision: Yahoo’s frequent changes in leadership and lack of a clear vision contributed to its downfall. With each new leader came a different direction, leading to confusion and a lack of focus within the company. Companies need to maintain consistent leadership and a clear vision to guide their strategic decisions and ensure long-term success.
  4. Recognize and Nurture Investments: Yahoo’s failure to fully capitalize on its investment in Alibaba, Tumblr and others is a valuable lesson in recognizing and nurturing investments. While Yahoo’s initial investment in Alibaba provided a significant boost to the e-commerce giant’s growth, it ultimately failed to capitalize on Alibaba’s soaring valuation. Companies should carefully evaluate and nurture their investments to maximize their potential returns and incite future growth.
  5. Protect Consumer Trust and Data: Yahoo’s data breaches in 2013 and 2014 severely damaged its reputation and eroded consumer trust. Companies must prioritize data security and take proactive measures to protect customer information. Building and maintaining trust with consumers is crucial for long-term success and brand reputation.
Exit mobile version